CLCapacityLineQUALIFICATION RELIABILITY
REPRODUCIBLE DECISION CONTRACT / CL-QB-1.0

A cheap answer is useless
if it is wrong.

Across 32 synthetic adversarial cases: 0 false-qualified and 4/4 valid controls passed. CapacityLine qualifies only commitments that survive buyer policy, identity, transcript grounding, read-back, and consistency. It then stress-tests the fallback—and never releases an order.

ADVERSARIAL CASES32

Named, inspectable tests

FALSE-QUALIFIED0

In the published synthetic set

POSITIVE CONTROLS4/4

Prevents a trivial block-everything result

VISIBLE GUARDRAILS12

Applied to each commitment

SAME INPUTS · DECLARED EXPECTATIONS / CL-CB-1.0

What happens when you leave the evidence out?

168 synthetic cases. 6 policy families. Equal numbers of valid and invalid commitments. Every method sees the same inputs; refusing everything is measured as a failure to recover valid options.

Mechanism comparison—not a ranking of competing products
MethodUnsafe offers accepted
Lower is better
Valid offers recovered
Higher is better
Valid offers missed
Lower is better
CapacityLineThe full production qualification evaluator.0 / 8484 / 840 / 84
Availability-only baselineAccepts a supplier's structured availability flag; no buyer-policy checks.78 / 8484 / 840 / 84
Structured-fields baselineChecks commercial fields, identity and validity; omits transcript grounding, final read-back, contradictions and voice quality.24 / 8484 / 840 / 84
Block-all controlRefuses everything, exposing the cost of a trivial zero-false-positive policy.0 / 840 / 8484 / 84

Developer-authored, correlated regression fixtures—not an independent held-out study. No competing product, human team, phone-network performance or customer savings were measured.

QUALIFICATION GATE / RECOVERY FRONTIER

Qualify the fallback.
Then try to break it.

The same recorded commitments are replayed against harder operating conditions. In the deterministic reference case, every single shock remains covered and the first uncovered gap requires two concurrent conditions.

Inspect the comparison evidence
SINGLE SHOCKS5/5

Quantity, deadline, price, exact-part, and primary-path tests remain covered.

FIRST BREAK2

Concurrent conditions—not a hidden confidence score—create the first uncovered gap.

RELEASE BOUNDARYRFQ

The output is evidence for human review. CapacityLine creates no order, contract, or payment.

The frontier re-evaluates recorded commitments only; it does not predict supplier capacity or shared fault-domain independence.
WHAT EARNS QUALIFICATION

Evidence is part of the decision—not decoration after it.

The evaluation is deterministic and fail-closed. Unknown stays unknown, missing data stays visible, and hard buyer rules cannot be traded for a higher aggregate score.

01

Supplier words, not generated prose

The evidence quote must occur in a supplier transcript turn. A plausible sentence invented after the call fails.

02

Named operating authority

An affirmative flag alone is insufficient. The respondent name and role must also be present.

03

Hard policy remains hard

Unapproved part, missing current certification, or disallowed origin cannot win on speed or price.

04

Final read-back and consistency

A commitment is not qualified without affirmative read-back and no material contradiction.

THE FAILURE SURFACE / ALL CASES

Inspect what the system refuses to overstate.

These are synthetic failure and uncertainty cases evaluated against the reference buyer policy. Each row names at least one check that prevented a false qualification.

Call result integrityMissing, malformed, or incomplete results never become supplier commitments.
3 CASES

Unanswered callNo live commitment was obtained after the permitted call attempt.unreachable

Malformed provider resultNo live commitment was obtained after the permitted call attempt.unreachable

Incomplete structured resultRequired quantity · Ship-by date · Unit price ceiling · Approved part · Required certifications · Approved origin · Respondent authority · Quote validity · Transcript-grounded evidence · Final read-back confirmation · Statement consistencyineligible

Commercial commitmentQuantity, date, currency, price, availability, and validity must be explicit.
12 CASES

Unknown availabilityFull availabilityreview

Explicitly unavailableFull availabilityreview

Partial availabilityFull availabilityreview

Missing quantityRequired quantityreview

Zero quantityRequired quantityreview

Insufficient quantityRequired quantityreview

Missing ship dateShip-by datereview

Late ship dateShip-by datereview

Missing priceUnit price ceilingreview

Non-positive priceUnit price ceilingreview

Wrong currencyUnit price ceilingreview

Expired quoteQuote validityreview

Buyer policyAn attractive offer cannot bypass part, certification, or origin policy.
4 CASES

Unapproved partApproved partineligible

Ambiguous certificationRequired certificationsineligible

Expired certificationRequired certificationsineligible

Disallowed originApproved originineligible

Evidence & authorityNamed authority, grounded supplier words, confidence, read-back, and consistency are required.
10 CASES

Unconfirmed authorityRespondent authorityreview

Missing respondent nameRespondent authorityreview

Missing respondent titleRespondent authorityreview

Missing transcript evidenceTranscript-grounded evidence · Final read-back confirmationreview

Missing evidence quoteTranscript-grounded evidencereview

Evidence quote absent from transcriptTranscript-grounded evidencereview

Low-confidence extractionTranscript-grounded evidencereview

Non-finite confidenceTranscript-grounded evidencereview

Negative final read-backFinal read-back confirmationreview

Conflicting statementsStatement consistencyreview

Conversation qualityStructurally complete output is still held for review when the live exchange is fragmented.
3 CASES

Live result without quality assessmentNeeds buyer review for conversation quality.review

Repeated live openingNeeds buyer review for conversation quality.review

Fragmented live disclosureNeeds buyer review for conversation quality.review

HONEST LIMITS

This is a qualification test—not a claim of supplier truth or saved downtime.

  • This benchmark tests deterministic qualification behavior, not phone-network reliability or supplier truthfulness.
  • Synthetic fixtures are not customer outcomes and are not evidence of avoided downtime or savings.
32 ADVERSARIAL / 0 FALSE-QUALIFIED / 4 OF 4 VALID CONTROLS

See the blocked cheap offer.
Then inspect why.

Run product proof